A false sense of security
“Israel Launches Attacks Against Iran; Iran Begins Retaliation“ (Smith). Is Smith Jewish? Her response is ridiculous - many white people argue against the effects of ‘white supremacy’, yet that doesn’t in the least immunize all white people from the problems caused by ‘white supremacy’. A handful - yes, they are loud and well represented in the (((media))), but we’re talking about, at most, dozens of people - of Jews purport to oppose the absolute worst excesses of Jew Genocide, and that suddenly absolves the whole lot of them, and allows the Jew Genocide to proceed apace? This is important, as it is exactly this kind of trickery which enables the Jews to do worse and worse things to more and more people. The problem with the Jews, including the Jew Genocide, is a problem with the Jewish people, based entirely on Jewish supremacism, and that includes the fact that (((they))) bribe and blackmail pervert Western politicians to assist in their Jew Genocides, which didn’t start with Gaza, have been going on for over 100 years, and will get worse unless we understand the true conceptual framework which will stop them. We have to stop listening to this genocide-protecting nonsense that nobody is responsible, goyim, well maybe Bibi (who will soon die and be replaced by a Jew at least as bad).
“Colossal 'Intel Breach' Puts Israeli Nuclear Sites in Iran's Crosshairs“ (Whitney). Is this leak why ‘Israel’ was in such a hurry to attack? Of course, despite having ultra-Zionist agent Witkoff in place, (((they))) may have been terrified that Trump might do a deal with Iran.
“Memo from Iran: WE ARE READY“ (Whitney):
Quid pro quo (definition)—“something given or received for something else.” In practical terms this could mean ‘I donate $100 million to your presidential campaign, and you move the Capital of Israel to Jerusalem or allow Israel to annex the Golan Heights or provide the resources for toppling the government in Syria or provide an endless supply of bombs and weapons for killing Palestine’s native population. Or it could refer to something else entirely, something even more ambitious, like air strikes on Iran that could trigger a Third World War and the banishment of the US from the Middle East for good. Of course, what this implies is that the billionaire donors who contributed to the Trump campaign did so “with strings attached” which means they expect something in return. In this case, they expect Trump to lead the United States into a war with Iran because that will improve Israel’s chances of emerging as the regional hegemon, the most powerful country in the Middle East.
Is that the bargain that “horse-trader” Trump made to win the presidential election in 2024 (and to make his legal problems vanish overnight)?
We think it is. In fact, we never thought for a minute that Trump’s nuclear talks with Iran were a sincere effort to resolve the main issues peacefully. From the very beginning, it was clear that the negotiations were a sham aimed at creating a pretext for launching a war. Now we can see that assessment was right.
and:
Netanyahu would never attack Iran without a green light from Washington. Otherwise, his strategic bombers would be turned around before they ever entered Iranian airspace (just as they were in Israel’s assault last year.) Israel needs America’s muscle to have any impact on Iran’s nuclear sites at all. That suggests that Netanyahu expects Iran to deliver a withering retaliatory blow that will require Uncle Sam to “ride to the rescue’ with guns blazing. This analysis is supported by comments that appeared at Axios on June 12. According to Barak Ravid:
“US envoy Steve Witkoff privately warned top Senate Republicans that Iran’s retaliation to an Israeli strike on its nuclear program could overwhelm Israel’s defenses and cause mass damage and casualties.”
Well, if Iran’s retaliation “could overwhelm Israel’s defenses”, then why would Israel launch an attack?
It’s obvious, isn’t it? So, that Uncle Sam would be forced to intervene for ‘poor Israel’. Isn’t that what this charade is all about?
It is. But will Iran take the bait?
Yes, it will, but not for the reasons that many people think. Iran is not being lured into a trap. Iran is simply going to defend itself with the weapons it has at its disposal; and those weapons will be sufficient to beat both the United States and Israel. Iran is a hypersonic missile superpower with an offensive capability that remains unacknowledged by analysts in the West whose views are shaped by their own narrow ideology rather than by hard evidence of technological advances. Air strikes by Israel mean that we will see the impact of the developments in real-time in the form of smoldering military bases, weapons depots, critical infrastructure and Israel’s prized nuclear facilities.
“How Israel and the U.S. manufactured a fake crisis with Iran that could lead to all-out war“ (Plitnick).
“Trump, lawmakers, and Israel lobby all celebrate Israel’s attack on Iran“ (Arria).
“How an Israeli-American deception campaign lulled Iran into a false sense of security“ (Berman).
“Breaking news and analysis on day 616 of the Gaza genocide | The Electronic Intifada“ (with Dr. Mohammad Marandi).
“[SPECIAL EDITION] Prof. John Mearsheimer : FIRST STRIKE BY ISRAEL - Can Iran Defeat Israel?“ (Napolitano).
“Iran Vows REVENGE as Trump Praises Israel's Attacks with U.S. SUPPORT | Elijah J. Magnier“ (Blevins). Hints that Hezbollah is getting back into the game.
“Trump Greenlit Israel's War on Iran | Cold War 2.0 by Syriana Analysis“ (with Dr. Tarik Cyril Amar). These American mindfuck games.
If Trump wanted to show he was acting in good faith and is acting out of a sincere desire for peace, he could publicly approach Iran and tell them if they forego the counterattack, he will drop Witkoff’s Zionist requirements for no enrichment/no ballistic missiles, and do a fair deal with Iran. When he doesn’t do this, Americans have to realize he is acting treasonously out of motives of being bribed and blackmailed by Jews operating out of Jewish supremacist motives, and will inevitably lead the US into a war which will lead to the economic devastation of the world economy, including the economy of the US.
Trump can multi-task, so while he sets up a war which will wreck the world economy, including the US economy, he is also wrecking the US economy with his trade nonsense: “Another Promise Made and Promise Undelivered“ (Bin). Most responses are funny and/or wise.